Be careful what you wish for. You might just get it.
recent Western proverb that puzzles the occasional Chinese speaker
Over at SHMD1 Jim is reflecting on the meaning of early retirement for him. Intimately bound with that, of course, is what the meaning of work was for him. Retirement is the yin to the yang of work, it is often thought of in terms as a freedom from. If you’re looking for the PF angle in this piece, there isn’t one. It’s not about the how, it’s about the why, which is inherently subjective.
In looking at people who have retired, be it early or not, there are many common themes. Jim prepared himself far better for early retirement than I did, because I realised I wanted early retirement one day all of a sudden in 2009. Although it’s easy to infer that I really hated my job, I didn’t – it served me well for thirty years in all, and gave me intellectual challenge and a congenial atmosphere for 27 of those years. What I came to hate was the performance measurement system – it was the performance art in a panopticon I came to loathe – I have, in my entire 30 years at work only had one rotten quarterly appraisement. Because of other changes in my personal life, this shattered my self-image2, and I initiated the escape program executed over the following three years. This post isn’t about that.
Looking back, it seemed I had two advantages on many people who retire, and find some part of themselves is going “yes, and now what?” it seems, when it comes to actually enjoying being retired3. One, being an introvert, is innate, but the other is conceptual – that of the cycle of life and its stages.
Introverts have a harder time at work. They have an easier time as retirees.
It’s not hard to see why. I somewhat simplistically mused if the difference showed in the amount of money each type needed. Yes, there probably is a difference in the amount of money needed, but this is an effect, not a cause. Let’s take a look at what Carl Jung said about the two traits4
Each person seems to be energized more by either the external world (extraversion) or the internal world (introversion).
Introverts are interested primarily in their own thoughts and feelings, in their inner world; they tend to be introspective. One danger for such people is that as they become immersed in their inner world, they may lose touch with the world around them. The absent-minded professor is a clear, if stereotypical, example.
Extroverts are actively involved in the world of people and things; they tend to be more social and more aware of what is going on around them. They need to guard against becoming dominated by external events and alienated from their inner selves. The hard-driving business executive who has no understanding of feelings or relationships is a classic stereotype of unbalanced extraversion.
Well, duh. Extroverts rock at work. They play well to the gallery which is an increasing trend of the metricised world of work and modern business theories of management. The whole point of work is to grab the external world by the balls and whack it around the chops to become a different shape. Western culture got where it got today by being extroverted and changing the world. That’s why when you flick the switch on your heating your house gets warmer – because legions of other human beings got to work pummeling the world into a different and very specific shape so that gas comes into your house, is burned in a controlled way, hot water goes round the radiators and you get warm. Previous generations had to go out and shovel coal or chop wood. I’ve spent a long time disparaging excess consumerism but it’s not all bad – central heating and vaccination against polio were not prevalent when I was born.
As a young man I had to fight the introverted nature to find success in the world. The first Turning Outward, around the mid twenties, is about the world of people and things. The world of work did once tolerate introverts in its engineers locked away in the lab5making clever shit happen. In an increasingly connected and competitive world they get the sand kicked in their faces, one is because there’s always a cheaper guy in the massively expanded global labour pool, plus they are not team players in a business environment and people think of them like this:
Introverts have long been prejudicially perceived6 as being selfish, narcissistic, pathologically shy or even psychotic. You know the sort, the shy, dangerous loner with the gun.7
So the extrovert stops work, and all of a sudden a load of noise and hum goes quiet, the phone stops ringing, and after a while he goes WTF – get me outta here! It’s a lot more common than is given credit for, and indeed I have seen people who have gone back to work not because they needed the money, but they needed the meaning. There’s nothing wrong in that, indeed one of the hazards of FI is that at least the early retiree who goes back to work because he miscalculated and needs the money knows a good reason why he is there. Whereas the early retiree who is financially independent has some serious questions to ask themselves about why they are returning to work, because it isn’t for the money. The extrovert has to fight the extroverted nature to find success in retirement, because it is the turning inward, that complements the quarterlife turning outward. His other option is to stall the change, more of which later.
So the ermine, as an introvert, stops work, and all the noise and hum stops, and, well, peace at last. I did actually think about the web of life and connection with other people across the three years as I was getting out and took some steps to widen this, and some of it was eased by being involved in a community farm which gives me a ready-made community. I think it’s really hard for extroverts to realise that for the introvert, the whole frickin’ point of becoming FI is to go nuclear on your career. Take the battle to the enemy – work steals my time and stops me being me. I am working now not because I need the money, but because I am filling a hole efficiently that would need more resource to fill otherwise, and I care about the project and people. I don’t volunteer – 30 years of working for a living means if people want my time and commitment they can damn well pay for it, I would otherwise find it demeaning. I presume all the good people volunteering at bird reserves and the like are extroverts, as such they are getting something they need. It takes all sorts to build a world. But I’m not working for the money and as soon as someone or something better suited comes along to fill my shoes, great. Bring it on. I am Rhett Butler to the Scarlett O Hara of work
Turning freedom from into freedom to
Because it was reactive, I confess my search for financial independence was driven by freedom from. Freedom from the endless measurement, the criticisms, the you need to be doing more and more, you need to be team player8, you need to sell yourself, you need to suck up this that and and the other to be good enough. I was already lethally individualistic and the shy, dangerous loner9 when, after splitting up with DxGF I heard one time too many in some ghastly all hands meeting the claptrap that there is no forced distribution, performance management is all about your individual contribution to The Firm. Like hell it is. It’s about controlling the pay bill while fostering the belief that employees have some control over the matter to encourage the hamsters to run a little faster, you sociopathic shits. It’s a zero-sum game from the employees’ pay.
Against a background of feeling hollow enough I didn’t give a damn but I demanded respect for my basic intelligence, I came to the conclusion that sometimes you have to lift the weapon, aim and fire. In amidst a hundred souls in a small lecture theatre, I stood up, and fixed the lying senior manager in the eyes. and said “Since there is no fixed ranking, as you say, you will, of course, be happy, in the interests of openness and transparency to publish the number distribution of the marks each quarter, and I will be pleased to collate this information. We will of course see the natural mean vary across time, while giving due regard to the central limit theorem over the long run10 when collated over many years, and we will expect some variance in the year-on-year means, and by inference the pay bill”. Finance obviously doesn’t want a randomly varying pay bill across departments, which is why you have a forced distribution per department. He said he would, but it never happened. Looked nervous when I caught his eye in an all-hands meeting after that, but at least the lie was not repeated.
It was that sort of daily demeaning bullshit that I wanted freedom from, as well as having to fabricate SMART goals etc. The world is going in a direction where people compete for false badges of performance – the gamification of work, social media and all that malarkey. Rhett Butler again. For sure, for personal dignity I wanted to do a decent job and deliver value at work, but I didn’t want to play the mind games or take part in the casual lies. I don’t pay games like that because I am largely internally referenced. I don’t play computer games, and I don’t play sports, and I don’t do personal bests. For what it’s worth, I got a notable payrise after that quarter, either because I was identified as dangerous and they were calculating how to run me out, or because the same loner stood up in another meeting on some project where people were high-fiving themselves about how they were going to build a great delivery system. And asked them what legal basis they would have for actually putting programmes onto that system, and did they understand the principles of licensing TV programmes in the specific Asian country they they were going to do all that stuff. Yes, I was an engineer and knew how you design the transmission system, but I had enough awareness of the big picture to realise paying customers get bored of watching testcard real fast. Paying customers are what makes it worth doing.
You do sometimes need the loner in business, because groupthink means an awful lot of bad ideas get to run too far too long. That project would have been a white elephant. It needed shooting.
Work is not the point of Life
The point of becoming FI is to go nuclear on your career. I mean FFS, it’s a serious grunt to become FI, and you don’t go through that sort of hurt to back off on the project at a whim. Despite all sorts of propaganda to the contrary, Work is not the whole point of Life in some fundamental way. It only gets to look that way after 30,40 years because – well, heck, if you get to 50-something and have thirty years of working life behind you like I had, then you’ve been doing this shit for more than half your life. How many of you at school felt that the one thing that was missing in your life was work? Not many, I’ll bet. You work because otherwise you get to suck up to pipsqueaks in the DHSS or go to prison for lamping them as they tell you to jump through a squillion hoops to get your £73 a week. Or you look at all the ads for lovely consumer stuff and figure you want some. The universal income can’t come soon enough, IMO. We don’t have enough work to match the intellectual capacity of most of our graduate output as it is, and it’s time we stopped pretending that picking up a shitload of debt is a way to get work. It isn’t, for many people. It’s a way to pick up a shitload of debt. End of.11
The point of putting up with the deprivation of becoming financially independent is to become a gentleman/woman of leisure. If you want to go part-time then for God’s sake give yourself an easier ride. It’s a much smaller ask to become well-off enough to only need to work two days a week, or four months a year if your business works that way. If you are going to go for gold, then once you have FI, don’t take prisoners. You are running out of Life 24 hours every day, don’t throw them away on Work once you have any other choice. The Times’s Luke Johnson kindly cited by Jim to save us the paywall shows the horrific paucity of imagination that can happen after you have spent half a lifetime working. You get Stockholm syndrome with Work, you start to believe it is in and of itself A Good Thing.
hostages express empathy and sympathy and have positive feelings toward
their captorsWork, sometimes to the point of defending and identifying with the captorsWork.
Slightly adapted from Wikipedia on Stockholm Syndrome
Retirement is arguably the biggest lifestyle change you will have made if you stop working after half a lifetime – most people won’t have been married or had children for as big a part of their lifetime as they’ll have been working if they get to their 50s in the traces. And there is some dignity in working and not freeloading off your fellow people, but once you’re done, you’re done. Which is then time to get on with the rest of Life.
Ah, Life, what’s it all about
Big questions need big answers. If the meaning of of Life looks like Work, well, you’ve taken 30+ years of your ticket to ride and used ’em badly, chum. As the old saw goes, nobody gets to their deathbed and says ‘I wish I spent more time at the office’. So, quite frankly, Luke Johnson, you, sir, are running away from Life. Whom do you serve, what do you want? The numbers to go up on some spreadsheet? Seriously, that gives you a rush? I can see the gravestone now. Luke Johnson. He Had Two Careers. Big ‘king deal. You ever been to a cemetery, mate? The headstones say devoted father, son, wife, husband. Nary a whisper of what he did at work unless it’s a military grave12. Nobody remembers you at work two weeks after your leaving do.
Now I do accept that each of us are different, and some readers will be thinking that their descendants are what it’s all about or something else, well, that’s all good as long as you haven’t spawned axe-murderers or a dynasty of unpleasant dictators. Others, well, it will be their ideas that will be their legacy. Some people touch others through their ideas and inspiration, or their art. It’s the people whose lives you touch, ideally in a good way, that are your legacy. Whatever it is, great. But if you look in the mirror and Work is the best you can do, then, well, okay, each to their own. But since this is my blog, and I’m sick and tired of the tedious assertion that Work is the point of Life, I call that out for the shortage of imagination it is. Yes, it’s my opinion. I am an old man compared to many of the current PF community, some of you are at the gateway of the having kids phase, a third of the way through your working lives, some at at the very beginning, you are in that long period of Work and Family being what life is all about.
But what life is about changes with time, and if it doesn’t then you are in trouble, ossification has set in and Stasis is the opposite of Life. There’s time enough to do that when you’re dead. It’s easy to lose sight of the change when it’s slow. What was it all about 30 years ago? For many it will be some of the earlier stages of Erikson’s developmental series. You’re not bothered with that so much now, potty training and walking are prerequisites for a career 😉 But it took up an awful lot of your time and energy at some stage. So why the hell should Work not be one of those stages? Don’t dither in the crossways when the time is come, FFS, let it go. I’m of the opinion that early retirement is to get on with the process of individuation earlier. I was an early retiree, not the 30s-40s extreme early retiree, though I am still over 10 years from normal retirement age. Straight through, school-university-6months dole-work-work-work-postgrad-work-work-retire
So I have done my time with the harsh mistress called Work, and never took a gap-yah or a sabbatical. I didn’t come from a rich enough background to even think of a gap-yah, and these were unusual in the late 1970s. Millennials may bitch about the load of student fees with some reason, 13 but the very fact that gap years are much more common now shows how much richer Britain has become in the intervening thirty-odd years. I haven’t done things like travel to find myself (hint: you’re looking in the wrong place. Julia Roberts looked great in Eat Pray Love but it’s a movie, a myth, a metaphor, not real Life) or climb Mount Kilimanjaro to show I am hard. I got out of work because I was sick of metrics, and I believe it’s worth putting the time in to become wise enough to know what you value without having to measure it up against an external reference all the time. You live life, you don’t measure it, or Facebook/Instagram it, the movie of the life you live is shot in the first person, it’s not reportage.
Over those 30-35 years I have learned that work ain’t all that. Don’t get me wrong, it can be fun, you can have a good time, do good and challenging stuff, and have some great memories and make good friends, and whip some small part of the world into shape. But really, Luke, if you find Life without Work empty and meaningless, you need to get out more. And since you were necky enough to intimate that you had the one truth, I’m gonna be necky enough to say you didn’t just fail to locate the bullseye, you’re not even in the same room as the target and you’re looking the wrong way. A second career at 60 is displacement activity. There’s a cycle of stages of life 14 from birth to death, and wanting to prolong the work bit is arrested development. Luke, you’re like those really clever guys who want to freeze their heads after death so they can live for ever, without having jumped to the elementary fact that the only way to live for ever is to avoid dying in the first place.15
Fortunately other people have been here before me, Carl Jung, but more accessibly perhaps, Joseph Campbell, he of the hero’s journey and the monomyth. Eat Pray Love, for an example was a narrative, not a recipe, that’s what myth is. Western culture is desperately short of rites of passage across the great transitions of life, but by observation there are at least two big ones of adult life IMO. Childhood is wasted on mastering some basic skills, puberty is a big one, but internally focused, and we don’t even have any rites of passage for that. But there are two big transitions after you have come of age, which mind-wise is usually > 21 from what I can see.
The first unrecognised turning is the turning outward (Erikson’s stage 6, Love), when you have established who you are to yourself and immediate peer-group, and begin to refine the face you present to the world. I look at the Guardian Millennials primal scream, and I see two conflated forces. One is some issues have genuinely become harder, because greater communications have concentrated work and power to the Imperial core of decadent London. We have also become far more antisocial – there are more single households than there used to be, which is a serious problem for housing. The other is the angst of being 25 – the quarter-life crisis and the intimacy vs isolation thing, which is as old as Mankind. Your twenties are when you shift focus on getting control of who you are to you to who you are to everybody else. There is seriously no fun in that at all, there’s no damn roadmap – the milestones for my parents and me are hoplessly out of date in today’s society. For me it was (not in exactly that order) get a job, get a girl, get a house, get kids16, retire, die. We will all get to die. Not every fella goes for the girls, that’s cool, but most want somebody to love. Not all by a long chalk – a third of us live on our own, and having kids is not the must-have among college-educated women. You aren’t supposed to stereotype because every one of us is a special snowflake, but in the round that first turning outwards is tough.
In our individualistic Western traditions, of course, we don’t acknowledge this is tough because the Individual is King, we are masters of all we survey, and we have the myth of the endless more. In my mid twenties I could have slapped every jerk who told me “you are young, the the world is your oyster and this is about as good as it gets” So why the hell am I finding life pointless, girls just want to be friends, and I am stuck with endless choice and no damned idea of which way is up and where to allocate the meagre fruit of my labours? Oh yes, and why I am in a crummy bedsit in London and can’t afford to even think of buying a ‘king house? The oysterpeople lied, it does get better, but I’d deserve that slap if I tried to snap some young Millennial out of it with the same words because, well, the process of transformation is not a spectator sport. You must do it to integrate the learning. This turning outwards is tougher on introverts, I mean FFS, it is the turning outwards, the intimacy vs isolation phase. Introverts tend to flunk this, the archetypal geek who has no date for the prom. Engineers seem to be a particularly maladjusted and introverted crew, the Firm had way too many single guys all the way through late middle age17, despite the fact many girls in the town seemed to be quite happy with the fact that the odds were good but the goods were odd. That’s tech and geeks for you.
But the guy who easily got the date for the prom and steams through at the top of their game through work tends to flunk the second call 30-40 years later, the turning inward, because he is now playing against type (Erikson’s Stage 8, where he takes the typical retirement age of 65, but early retirees get to do this earlier, assuming they have offed the kids that is). It’s another stage for which the modern world has no rite of passage, for sure we’ve been to enough retirement ceremonies where we see the old boy, and glad-hand him, wish him well, and ignore the dead eyes that see an endless routine of gym trips, shopping and daytime TV. Or, heaven help them, you could be Luke Johnson, and flunk the call to the turning inwards, because hey, success looks like work -spin the old hamster wheel again. Because, as the lovely lady once sang, every place you travel through, still yourself you see.
Who looks outside, dreams. Who looks inside, awakes
Retirement is a curious reversal of the forces that endless favour the extrovert in the Western world. It can be an awakening, but the likelihood of this is less than 50% by observation. If it isn’t an awakening, it is a stasis or a decline. Luke wants to be a serial entrepreneur because he can’t direct his gaze to the next stage in his life because he clings to old forms, in the way Donald Trump clings to the memory of when he had hair. You can run, Luke. But you can’t hide…every place you travel through, still yourself you see.
I missed the point of retiring too, but in my favour I did not stand in the way of progress, and it was easier tor me to rattle across the switch of the Turning Inwards without the brakeman seizing the wheels at the horror of running on a single track. For two years I slowly recovered from cutting off parts of my being to be able to face the external world and to become FI. Getting to FI may be easy for London-based finance people to do, but it is a massive ask for ordinary grunts or even relatively lucky mustelids. But even that was not enough, I restored myself to roughly what I was as a worker drone in 2009, after 27 years of work. The recovery was slow, because it was passive, always falling back and falling back waiting for Time. I thought I was done after two years, but I was wrong, because personal growth is not a spectator sport – the journey transforms the traveller who looks how they are changed inside by the landscape they pass through, not the tourist who looks only out the window at the scenery.
The process is slow, but it is steady if undisturbed. I gained some childish playfulness, I listen up to the sound of the birds singing, I live more in the moment. And gently and faintly I hear a change from minor to major key in the sound of the distant drummer. The change in key is from freedom from to freedom to. Many of the crises in a life long enough have a natural diastole and systole, the first part is passive and undirected, the passage of Time. I had to fall back and fall back and fall back until the unconscious processes of repair achieved enough that the system can take the strain of the active part, the freedom to picks up from the freedom from.
Like Luke, I too was running away, but unlike Luke, I was not running away from myself, so once there was enough distance from the noise and hum of Work I could hear the still voices that whispered to me what I wanted to do. I called it out okay in About when I started this a few years ago
I have seen too many days from inside office windows, I want to hear the birds, live more simply and frugally and drink in the days, rather than sleepwalk my way through them
So, extroverts of the world, you’ve had your glorious time in the sun, you’ve earned more money than I did if you had the same talents as I, and you absolutely stormed it at work, which is why some of you have this problem of what a successful early retirement looks like. And now the tables have turned. My time has come, because in the Turning Inward I am in my element. Let’s hear it from Carl Jung again 18. I want a similar level of wisdom in my eighties, should I be graced to get that far, and I have 30 years to understand myself well enough to get to where he was at his age 😉 Of course I am different, I will see things he missed, and I am sure I will miss things he saw. It is no matter. That is the point of retirement, the freedom to gain understanding and wisdom – and it’s personal. Freedom from the time sink and outward perspective of work is a necessary, but not sufficient condition to retire well.
[…] After all, we try to equip young people with all the education they need for the building up of a successful social existence. This kind of education is valid for about as far as the middle of life—say, thirty-five to forty years. Man nowadays has a chance to live twice as long, and the second half of life has for many people a structure which is thoroughly different from the first half. But this fact remains just as often unconscious. One does not realize that the rising tide of life carries young people forward to a certain summit of safety, fulfilment, or success. In this period one can forget bad experiences; life is still new and fresh, and every day renews its hope that it may bring the desired
things which one has missed hitherto.
It is when you approach the ominous region round the fortieth year that you look back upon the past which has accumulated behind you and the silent questions approach you, stealthily or openly: Where am I standing today? Have my dreams come true? Have I fulfilled my expectations of a happy and successful life as I imagined them twenty years ago? Have I been strong, consistent, active, intelligent, reliable, and enduring enough to seize my opportunities or to make the right choice at the crossroads and produce the proper answer to the problem which fate or fortune put before me? And then the final question comes: What is the chance that I shall fail again in fulfilling that which I obviously have been unable to accomplish in the first forty years?
Then, with the beginning of your life’s second part, inexorably a change imposes itself, subtly at first but with ever-increasing weight. Whatever you have acquired hitherto is no longer the same as you regarded it when it still lay before you—it has lost something of its charm, its splendour and its attractiveness. What was once an adventurous effort has become routine. Even flowers wilt, and it is hard to discover something perennial which will endure. Looking back slowly becomes a habit, no matter how much you detest and try to suppress it. Like the wife of Orpheus emerging from the underworld, who could not resist casting the forbidden look behind her, and consequently had to return from whence she came.
This sort of thing is what you might call the “way of life a revers,” so characteristic of many people and which at the beginning is adopted quite unawares: to continue in one’s accustomed style, if possible more and better—to improve on the past, as if your disposition, which accounts for all your past failures, would be different in the future. But without your being aware of it your energy is no longer attracted to its former objectives in the way it was before: enthusiasm has become routine and zeal a habit. The backwards look will not fail to show you sides and aspects of yourself long forgotten and other ways of life you have missed or avoided before. […]
Soon unconscious fantasies begin to play with other possibilities, and these can become quite troublesome unless they are made conscious in time. They may be mere regressions into childhood, which prove to be most unhelpful when one is confronted with the difficult task of creating a new goal for an aging life. If one has nothing to look forward to except the habitual things, life cannot renew itself any more. It gets stale, it congeals and petrifies[…]. Yet these insipid fantasies may also contain germs f real new possibilities or of new goals worthy of attainment.
One might advise old people to live on with the times, and realize that time would provide them with all necessary novelties. But such easy advice takes it for granted that an old individual is capable of perceiving and agreeing with new things, ways, and means. But this is just the trouble: new goals demand new eyes which see them and a new heart which desires them. In all too many cases life is disappointing and even the most cherished illusions do not last forever. It is all too easy to reach the conclusion: plus fa change, plus fa reste la meme chose. That is a fatal conclusion, however: it blocks the flow of life and causes ever so many troubles of a physical or mental nature. Your pure rationalist, who bases his expectations on statistical verities, is thoroughly perplexed when he has to deal with such cases because he ignores the one important practical fact that life is always an exception, a “statistical random phenomenon.”
It is so because it is always the life of an individual, who is a distinct, unique, and inimitable being, and not “life in general,” since there is no such thing. Then what do you advise this inimitable being to do once he passes the ominous age of forty?
An ever-deepening self-knowledge is, I’m afraid, indispensable for the continuation of real life in old age, no matter how unpopular self-knowledge may be. Nothing is more ridiculous or inept than elderly people pretending to be young—they even lose their dignity, the one prerogative of age. Looking outwards has got to be turned into looking into oneself. Discovering yourself provides you with all you are, were meant to be, and all you are living from and for. The whole of yourself is certainly an irrational entity, but this is just precisely yourself, which is meant to live as a unique and unrepeatable experience. Thus, whatever you find in your given disposition is a factor of life which must be taken into careful consideration.
I can honestly say that I have never missed Work in the last three and a half years. I’ve been at the odd celebration and drinks with ex-colleagues since then, but these were the People, not the Work. Work is massively overrated, and I can say that so far retirement has just got better and better with time 🙂 I am still slowly peeling pack the repressed inner elements that found no expression in 30 years of working , and possibly even before-
Repression is a process that begins in early childhood under the moral influence of the environment and continues through life.
[“The Personal and the Collective Unconscious,” Carl Jung, CW 7, par. 202.]
Now I am perfectly open to the charge that extroverts will view the process of understanding myself better and deepening. the process of individuation, is a narcissistic endeavour. That’s fine with me, but I don’t have their angst about missing work. Each to their own. Luke’s welcome to his serial entrepreneurship. I become a better listener and sounding board for people, and I gradually improve my general education and openness to different ideas. Overall I’ll try and take becoming a better and deeper human being over starting yet another company, but hey, whatever floats your boat. Gnothi Seauton will do for my gravestone, reads better than He Lived. He Worked. He Died 😉 Indeed, I will go further – many entrepreneurs and pretty much the entire CEO and officer class show the psychopathology of the extrovert writ large. They charge around like big swinging dicks changing this that and the other, they close offices because thy can and put swathes of grunts out of work, they introduce pathological employment practices like zero-hours contracts and all that performance management shit because it gives them a feeling of being alive. We’ve seen this movie before – I don’t normally like punk, but “Keith Joseph smiles and a baby dies on Beasley Street” sums up the same attitude from the 1980s.
I was unlucky enough to start looking for a job in the next year, Thatcher’s first recession. It was a dirty job, and some of it did need to happen, Scargill’s rent-a-goons did need taking down IMO, but the ensuing scorched earth policy is why there will not be a Northern Powerhouse three decades on – the social fabric wasn’t just razed, the ground was salted too.
An awful lot of CEO types pump themselves up like peacocks telling themselves they are so great and like the Wolf of Wall Street. The obvious question then, is why is productivity flatlining and exactly why are they looting the shareholders for their own self-aggrandisement. If I spend the next 30 years trying to gain wisdom and it doesn’t amount to a hill of beans, it is probably less damaging to Britain that is some arrogant CEO forgoes the golf course to perpetrate more destruction of shareholder value. Ogilvy Mathers who was Luke’s cause celebre spend 50 years in advertising getting us to buy crap that we don’t need with money we don’t have to please people we don’t like. Mind you, I have a sneaking suspicion the old boy was with Carl Jung in some ways
Big ideas come from the unconscious. This is true in art, in science, and in advertising. But your unconscious has to be well informed, or your idea will be irrelevant. Stuff your conscious mind with information, then unhook your rational thought process. You can help this process by going for a long walk, or taking a hot bath, or drinking half a pint of claret. Suddenly, if the telephone line from your unconscious is open, a big idea wells up within you.
but I don’t think he left the world a better place.
This is why the point of becoming FI is to go nuclear on my career
Jung’s narrative is stated better than I can say, but basically, my career was getting in my way. There are more important things for me to do with my life now, and I don’t have time for Work. At first I believed it was about freedom from, but I have not stayed still across the intervening three years, and gradually accrete some wisdom, and I came to see that I was wrong. Freedom from is necessary, but it is only when retirement becomes freedom to that I can embark on the next stage of the journey.
Younger folk can’t understand that, because they are not yet at that stage of life. Older ones may not understand it because this is not part of their calling, or perhaps they are refusing to progress -stasis is not an option. I am not saying that everyone is like me, we diverge more and more from each other as we get older, I know many people for whom the meaning of life is the way of the hearthfire and children and grandchildren are what it’s about for them at the early retirement stage of life.
Others volunteer for positive reasons, not to run away from the still, silent voice within but to lend their energies to making the world a better place. But many regress, they cannot surrender the lamps that illuminated their early and middle adulthood, they search without for what is probably to be found within. Far too many people vegetate, they lack the courage or the awareness to throw the switches of their life and it descends into endless dissipation, daytime TV and travel that is about novelty rather than experience. I have seen this failure in relatives from two generations of my own family, though in fairness to these people when you have worked from 14 to 65 work has been what you have been doing over three-quarters of your life, perhaps the failure to adapt to the change is more understandable.
What I am saying is undoubtedly wrong for some people, but in general I think Carl Jung had a lot of point. Our society has become dramatically more outward-focused, extroverted and lauds external success more than in the 1960s of that article. But for all that, and the stupendous improvements in the physical fabric and quality of nearly all material goods and services, why do we have such disaffection and widespread issues with mental health? We have symptom-addressing fixes like mindfulness masquerading for inner knowledge and wisdom. Mindfulness is probably necessary, but I would venture it is insufficient for any deep self-awareness, and people turn to it to try and address stress issues – freedom from, not freedom to.
Even the very rich extreme early retirees of the PF community aren’t so far from having to answer some of these difficult questions and operate the switches of their lives with intent, or stagnating. If you retire ten years earlier in life than I did, in your early forties, then Jung’s turning point will be on you in ten years – there’s a case to be made that modern living has retarded these stages of life compared to earlier generations because we live longer than they did; as a practical illustration people tend to have children in their mid thirties now rather than the mid-twenties of my parents’ generation. I missed my own turning point, it is clear looking back in the rear-view mirror occupying the early to mid forties. The turning inward is important – because it integrates many of the experiences of the first half of life, to become whole. I have seen that in some, though by no means all, of the elderly people around me when I was a child – even at a young age I could tell that they knew something that has special, and different from other people that age who did whatever the 1960s equivalent of going to the gym and watching daytime TV was. You lose some physical capacity as you age. It is when you catch yourself not gaining wisdom as you age that you know that you are on the wrong track.
Carl Jung note
I have borrowed from the ideas of the Swiss psychologist Carl Jung extensively in this post. I find his map of the world useful for my psyche, in particular the psychological types and the archetypes have a resonance for me. However, as this article shows, his ideas are often at variance with modern psychological principles, and some of the concepts make people with certain types of world-view which are very common in the PF community choke on their beer. You know the pack-drill, it’s the same as for finance- – DYOR, I may have it all wrong, what works for me may not work for you etc,
On the whole modern psychology has not viewed Jung’s theory of archetypes kindly. Ernest Jones (Freud’s biographer) tells that Jung “descended into a pseudo-philosophy out of which he never emerged” and to many his ideas look more like New Age mystical speculation than a scientific contribution to psychology.
However, whilst Jung’s research into ancient myths and legends, his interest in astrology and fascination with Eastern religion can be seen in that light it is also worth remembering that the images he was writing about have, as a matter of historical fact, exerted an enduring hold on the human mind.
The more accessible version is Joseph Campbell’s The Hero with a Thousand Faces which had some influence on a young fellow called George Lucas when he wrote a well-known mythical tale in the 1970s. It is possible that Jung’s map is not general but has a resonance for people of my mindset and that of a fair number of people I know. Since I am not a clinician there to sort out the problems of the world in general I am happy to run with a map that may only cover my part of the territory if helps me understand or at least orient myself. The process of individuation is not a spectator sport. You have to live it to do it.
- I can’t spell Jim’s blog out because otherwise at least one of my readers gets banned from here at work for a while ↩
- M Scott Peck, in the Road Not Travelled, sums up that often progression in life comes from loss. I had become brittle because I had thrown out elements of my psyche that I had rejected or couldn’t square with the requirements of the outer world. This is bad for the soul – rejecting capacities often pushes them into the unconscious, where they start to destroy and cause hurt. ↩
- The Internet Retirement Police will probably say that I am not really retired, since I earned over the £3600 pa you can stick in a pension as a true unemployed beach bum. The IRP can go stick it. I am probably the purest example of someone who genuinely doesn’t want to be working, but if I see people in the shit that I care about and I can fix it I will. There really is nothing about working that I miss! ↩
- The original reference is here, but Jung’s CW is dense and impenetrable. We should also remember that Jung’s patients came from the upper middle-class of his time (turn of the century to 1940s), and the women were typically SAHMs – some of the sexism in the description is probably from the sample bias. There appears to be less inherent difference in the capabilities of male and female humans than was assumed at the time. This bias affects more the description of the inferior functions than the concept of introversion and extroversion itself. ↩
- I choose engineers because I was one. There are no doubt other occupations that had a use for introverts but I can’t think of any at the moment. ↩
- https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/evil-deeds/201205/essential-secrets-psychotherapy-jungs-typology-eudaemonology-and-the-elusive ↩
this prejudice is not new, although it is being amplified by a culture that increasingly focuses on the outside form, sometimes at the expense of function. The young Ermine in a South London primary school was about to take the
eleven plussorry, “independently set test” for grammar school, and there was a report from my primary school, which was generally favourable but included the term “is a lone wolf”. My mother begged the headmaster to take that out, which he did, because she understood how that sort of thing puts a red dot on your back. ↩
- Every company I have seen wants ‘good team players’. I have never been a good team player, but I think I delivered value, albeit in a less connected world ↩
- everybody believes introverts are shy. As children yes, but if they make a successful transition across the first turning outwards in the mid-20s they are quiet, but not necessarily shy. I have led teams, and I can speak in public in front of hundreds of people ↩
- the central limit theorem states that the arithmetic mean of independent random variables will be approximately normally distributed. I aimed this knowledge at this dude’s head, to acknowledge that this used to be a premier industrial research facility, and he and I had been in it long enough and we both had scientific degrees, and that we both understood that one can estimate the expected variation on the mean value of a normally distributed quantity. And guess what, the mean ain’t always going to be the same, and if it is the game is up! HR fixers usually apply this mean each quarter because it’s easier to do it that way, faking a quarter on quarter variation is possible but time-consuming. I had the advantage of having seen the spreadsheet some berk in HR had failed to remove before sending out an all-personnel email broadcast, and I knew what the quotas were. ↩
- Yes, it is effectively a graduate tax as well/instead, but you only get to really believe that when you are 50 and the option lapses so the dead hand is lifted. For most of your working like you think of it as a mahoosive loan ↩
- in which case his work is usually what he died of, so it’s relevant ↩
- though they should note only 11% of school leavers went to university when I graduated – the taxpayer could probably do grants provided four out of every five putative Millennial students were rejected by their university for grades not up to scratch to control numbers and impose a defacto numerus clausus. Rationing the limited resource by academic ability is considered elitist these days, so we ration by financial backing instead. I am not clever enough to understand why having enough money is not elitist whereas having enough brains is ↩
- While I wrote the narrative in Jung’s terminology, Erik Erikson comes at it from a Freudian tradition, and there is much commonality in the stages to my untrained reading ↩
- There is no bootstrap BIOS in the human brain to restore state, even if the hardware survives the freezing process. And where the bloody hell is the hard disk preserving a static copy of the OS? It beats me that people like Ray Kurzweil who is about 1000 times cleverer than I am miss this inconvenient fact that a loss of dynamic living state is a pretty total loss of information and no backup. You’re better off believing in God or the Flying Spaghetti Monster than snappily freezing a cranium that has already lost the state called Life which is the bit you are trying to catch, FFS. At least God and the FSM are inherently unprovable and could be true, rather than missing the point by conflating physical form with function. ↩
- I passed on this one, it wasn’t for me ↩
- I am talking 20, 30 years ago, it is a much more balanced though average crew now they shut the laboratories down ↩
- Unfortunately I haven’t got a primary reference for this, I hacked it from the Net years ago. Suffolk Libraries doesn’t subscribe to the Sunday Times digital archive. I believe it was an article in the Sunday Times on the 17 July 1960 by Gordon Young, possibly titled the Art of Life and Carl Jung (who was 84 at the time) ↩
36 thoughts on “Freedom to, not freedom from is what retirement is about”
10: except distributions that have no finite second moment e.g. Cauchy. Or so my memory claims. I won’t look it up because that would be work.
I’m not sure Finance was ready for a pay distribution with an uncontrolled mean, however. They were already snippy about the expected variance 😉
Awesome, Awesome dissertation on life, you Sir are a Philosopher & a Gentleman. My path through life has mirrored yours quite closely to date, so obviously your thoughts & beliefs resonate more strongly for myself than I suspect it will for others. My personal reasons/problems that coincided with getting the roiling at Work that precipitated my plan to bail forever were undoubtedly different, but the effect was the same.
Looking back there is little I miss, the intellectual challenges & some people for sure, but as the Corporatisation of Work in general spread across the whole economy, it increasingly sucked the joy out of life. A colleague once put it better than I when I asked her why she was giving up against her bulling boss & resigning …..she said ”It’s not that I can’t hang in there any longer, just that I don’t want to slowly turn into the kind of person you have to be to survive here” So she wanted to leave while she still could recognise the difference & so had a chance, while she was still human enough.
Even now, 5 years after running for my life, I still shudder at the recall of pointless regular meetings organised so the reigning psychopaths at the time could have an audience to entertain themselves while jerking off their egos. As an introvert, not only was associating with people [you’d normally pay to be away from] so much of your day hard, but them having the power to make you do stupid things most of the time was intellectual torture. Freedom from the likes of that is priceless & I would say that extroverts are more likely to be the narcisists because they need the attention & so audience as they live through the validation of others, even if those others are strangers.
There are many ways to be seriously unhappy, but worrying what others may think of you has to be one of the fastest. So reaching an age or maturity where you can realise & accept that you don’t have to care what others think of you is amazingly liberating. It never failed to amuse me when people at Work let their identity become totally defined by what they ‘did’ – which in turn was reduced to being defined by their job description by dint of no balance or variety in their lives. Their reactions were priceless when arbitrarily replaced or even rendered redundant by those frequent restructures. Those restructures were mostly designed to shuffle the hierarchy of power as office dweebs battled for pissant incremental improvements in their status. [Whatever hogwash ‘Top Management’ claimed at the time] Guess what was obvious now? ……they had been forced to step off into real life but Corporate World didn’t even notice they’d gone ! So people whose self-worth was proven by how indispensible they were to the machine suddenly hit the buffers of reality & it wasn’t pretty.
Be all you can be, not a generic part in the brief flicker of a lifetime you get on this planet …….as a famous guy once said, if Work was so great, why don’t the rich [i.e. the few who actually have the choice] do it?
Thank you – although much of the ideas I borrowed from wiser heads!
“if Work was so great, why don’t the rich … do it?” I was an undergraduate so long ago that I saw [the end of?] an era when clever chaps of independent means might take an academic job, just for the interest of their discipline, and the fun of working with clever colleagues and students.
By contrast, when I was an academic about twenty-five years ago a bright colleague inherited a nifty heap of wealth and resigned in short order. It was the relentless war on the autonomy of academics that drove him out; if he’d been left in peace with the research and teaching he enjoyed he’d have been a happy bunny.
As my old Head of Department used to say “if the only way to get people to go home in the evening is to lock the labs, surely we must be doing things well?” Dear innocent days.
@dearieme, As a keen new graduate bursting into London for my first job at an Imperial College Biotech-startup spin-off, I remember being so impressed & then similarly infected by the dedication of the scientists. We were almost all straight out of academia, certainly by attitude and everyone stayed late every day working for peanuts but loving the cameraderie, just the joy of knowledge, the curiosity. [even though I could barely pay my bills at this point]
Then as the Company matured & we became more ‘professional’, the venture capitalist funders brought in more & more bullsh*t artists in their various roles & rolexes …..to blag more funding out of more stuffed suits – the atmosphere changed.
From being happy while paid peanuts, [yes the irony] we then became deeply dissatisfied seeing people who would sell their mothers for 5p [or nearest offer] take over while feeling nothing for the advancement of medical research. The rot then spread quite quickly & the carpark started emptying by 5pm sharp – because we felt like fools in comparison – because they didn’t disguise their contempt for us very well. In their eyes we were small children who couldn’t understand the game – it was all about money – in that you don’t have to genuinely try to find any new, useful drug, just do enough to fool the shareholders.
Another great article. I enjoyed reading it immensely. Please keep up the good work!
I think you miss the balance between effort and reward in considering the attractiveness of work
If you can get paid a six figure salary to just go to meetings, have people grovel to you, delegate everything, you get to tell everyone what to do and you are answerable to no one then working is pretty attractive
Feel like taking Friday afternoon off….”Oh I have a meeting….”
This is what Luke Johnson does all day with share options on top
I understand the power kick of saying jump and having people jump, though I probably never had the level of seniority that Luke has.
But the point still stands. What is he doing it for, after the Enough point? 😉
The desire to be top monkey on the tree defecting on all the other monkeys is strong in many captains of industry
If they were retired, even with many multiples of enough, where would they find many minions ready to say yassa massa to whatever crap they come up with?
I think that falls under the part of the narrative
Somewhere along the way when we moved to the share options and bonus culture companies started to reward that, the explosion of CEO pay for failure is a symptom of attracting the wrong sorts, not a cause.
It’s wasn’t so widespread in the executive class of until the mid-1990s – while I can’t say Ogilvy was overall good for the world I do admire his talent, and I would say he didn’t show the psychopathology of, say, Fred Goodwin, Richard Fuld or Bob Diamond.
Clearly enough is not as good as a feast.
I retired about 5 years later than you did, and I’ve been out of service 8 years longer. But I believe you really have your head screwed on straight.
I have never missed the work world for a second, never went back, never wanted to. I have always been an introvert and I agree retirement is easier for us. You do have to get past the “freedom from” stage which I certainly have by now.
I don’t need to get paid for the bit of IT work I do in my small town; if I can help a sick older lady get on Facebook safely or print her photos I am content I have made the world a bit better place.
Good for you, Mr MacDonald, good for you.
Interesting – I confess the switch from freedom from to freedom to caught me unawares.
And of course I salute your generous altruism!
“Freedom from the endless measurement, the criticisms, the you need to be doing more and more, you need to be team player 8, you need to sell yourself, you need to suck up this that and and the other to be good enough.” Yeah – I hear you on this, I had to put up with this crap for a good few years, and god damn I am angry with myself for how much importance I gave to this rubbish and the amount of emotional energy I wasted on it. Now I’m close enough to FI to not give a toss about this rubbish and am massively enjoying exacting my revenge by calling out all the HR inspired bullsh*t that we are expected to suck up and play along with everyday, it’s a lot of fun, and it amuses my colleagues, hell I might even hang around a bit longer than planned!
Reminds me of my old boss at BBC Television Centre when I was 20-something, he was 64 and NRA was 65. He absolutely terrorized Studio Engineering Control by calling out stupidity, Production absolutely loved him because he got things done for them 😉
As a late forties Antipodean clinical psychologist grappling with the role strictures of this profession in the current health system, FIRE has become an intensely sought goal in the last five years. Your delineation of Vocation (as a function of individuation) and Work highlights how much these concepts have become confused for people in modern, corporatised Western societies. I enjoyed your astute observations about the inadequacy of techniques (a la mindfulness) for engaging with the complexities of the mind and dilemmas of the human condition. These reflect the ‘gamed’ aspects of my profession as it’s currently constructed, where, instead of seeking to understand our fellow humans in order to help them learn to untangle themselves from life’s eddies, we toss out generic, simplified behavioural instructions like ‘Just keep your head up!’ FIRE will let me avoid the demands of treating large volumes of people by reference to symptom clusters in the brain (Work) and allow me to continue to pursue the more sustaining enterprise of engaging with individual minds (Vocation). I have quietly lurked here for a few years now and will continue to look forward to reading your valuable reflections.
Interesting – I’m glad I didn’t butcher/misrepresent the topic too much, as I am entirely a layman 😉 I can imagine how frustrating it must be to have to push things like mindfulness and CBT, and arguably things like NLP that to my mind fight the symptoms of dissonance between where an individual is going relative to where their internal nature/values want to follow.
Respite from the dissonance is all to the good, but it’s fighting the flames, not the fire IMO. I recall the counselling I had from the employee assistance programme, which was decent, but looking back missed the point in the same way.
It was all about getting exercise, mindfulness – which I couldn’t do because I couldn’t believe in it, and, entirely correctly, drinking less, which I couldn’t do because it made the pain go away.
Whereas fundamentally the fire burning underground was that I had outgrown the idea of work being the meaning of Life, so I needed to stop wasting my time and sort my crap out on doing what mattered for me. I was lucky, both in FIRE being possible, having a basic idea of individuation which gave a rough roadmap, and in having Mrs Ermine hold the thin thread across the gap.
Sir with this post I think you have peaked. Absolutely brilliant. I shall read it again and gain more insight into my own thoughts and opportunities. I am a similar age and I can find so many parallels its uncanny.
Thanks! – it does seem to be an issue of type as well as age – Jim is my age but I confess I just don’t recognise some of his narrative
At first I assumed that it was the freedom from/freedom to issue, I was clearly running away so I had a clear idea of why I was where I am. But I don’t think it’s as simple as that now.
Excellent post. I’ve been feeling a kind of quarter-life crisis this past year or so, and much of what you say is indeed applicable to all transition stages. I’ll have to look into Jung a bit more.
While for me that was more than half a lifetime ago, I still recall it all too well. I hadn’t come across the idea of a quarter-life crisis then.
I do think that the Western world desperately lacks rites of passage, while some of these challenges are inherent in the human condition and the process of individuation, having some sorts of waymarkers, and perhaps even a narrative of the stages of life would give us hooks to hang our personal myth on. Those rites of passage that we do have are shockingly materialistic, for instance the one of navigating puberty is often learning to manipulate a ton of metal across highways, the twenties one is a horrible chimera that is a very inappropriate hangover from previous generations of buying a house. Those previous generations married and had kids earlier, jobs were more stable and covered a wider range of the ability spectrum, and many people had five years more of working behind them because people often left school at 16, they didn’t have mahoosive student debt and house prices to average earnings were lower.
So not only do we have rites of passage that are about what you have rather than what you are which is bad enough, but they are anachronistic too!
I’d say I’ve probably been one of the “lucky few” in the West to experience a traditional rite of passage in the form of military training (no naked roll mat fighting admittedly) and arguably again when I first crossed the equator or maybe stuff that’s happened whilst deployed. Whilst I take your point about the general inadequacy of modern Western rites of passage, none of this has had much impact on my levels of existential angst.
Reading the Guardian article you linked, the main concerns – jobs, money and marriage – seem pretty banal to me, so I’m probably not experiencing much of what most would call a mid-life crisis. For me it’s more a search for meaning/passion/vocation.
Military training certainly meets the definition – indeed the line-crossing ceremony is one of the examples cited in the wikipedia definition, which I was unaware of.
The Guardian article shows some of the problems Western thought has with the whole meaning/significance side of things
Meaning is essentially subjective, which to many people means it doesn’t exist. However, Jung and Campbell seem to find many commonalities in the subjective experiences – the ‘observable by independent observers’ part of the analytical method, but without the ‘independent of the observer’ first requirement for something to be objective.
There’s no good general introduction to Jung’s thinking that I’ve come across. I found enough resonance with the narrative of Memories, Dreams Reflections to follow it up, that’s probably the best introduction. I didn’t have the Internet when I read it. Collected Works is tough reading!
Work is highly overrated, unless you really enjoy what you are doing, in which case you are very lucky, or easily satisfied. I, as an INTJ, found the politics within most organisations enough to drive you mad and the policies and procedures would smother any initiative or creativity. This isn’t limited to companies, I see it with a charity where my wife volunteers, the same petty office politics, must be the human condition.
Unfortunately work is a useful tool for governments to control vast swathes of the population, load ’em up with student debt, horrific mortgages and tax everything so the suckers have to have their noses to the grindstone. Then when they get nearer to freedom day, you shift the goalposts back by a couple of years (or 5 if you happen to be female).
I sleepwalked through 25 years of that, thank god I’m awake now. Although without the 25 years and some serious saving I wouldn’t be FIRE.
Money doesn’t give you things, money gives you freedom and the biggest freedom is the power and ability to say “No” I don’t want/need to do that anymore. Or as a rather rude and wise person put it “Life is like a s#it sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s#it you have to eat”.
I’m not sure I’ve added much to your excellent dissertation other than the fact that there are other people out there who get what you’re ranting on about.
Hi Ermine, thanks for referencing my post. In my retirement I’ve increasingly found the absolute division of work/retirement totally unhelpful. It’s all just “life”, isn’t it? A bit of what you fancy does you good, and it’s up to you to discover what that is.
That was a good post! as indeed was You’re not my type It’s kind of curious twist fo fate that I, who never wanted to work ever again am, sort of, and your good self, who has some ambivalence on the going nuclear aren’t at the mo, but as you say, that’s Life 🙂
I do think a concept of the stages of life helps me with this, but I can’t claim great intentional living. Up until 2009 I though I would be working until NRA of 60, so it’s not like I stood back and looked at the big picture. Until something inside refused to carry on.
Having said that, I really do think that Luke fellow is running away from his personal development, but it is only my opinion, and he has to ham it up to get a good narrative, too!
His (Luke’s) column in the Sunday Times today made my blood boil a bit, trying to argue that “swashbuckling entrepreneurs” are good for society. I hope he was hamming it up, but I’m not so sure!
A very well thought out and resonant post indeed. I’m somewhat introverted, and I can absolutely relate to your summing up of the respective experiences of the introvert and extrovert in the tricky matters of working/not working.
I’ve now been working part-time (a couple of days a week) for three years, and I had sort of thought I would be happy to do that more or less indefinitely. After all, what could be nicer? Lots of days off, but a steady income each month. And my work is worthwhile to society, no meetings or nonsense involved, so there is a satisfaction in that.
But, recently, I have begun to realise that I am basically simply marking time with this working plan – not something that is such a good idea when your next birthday will be your 60th. Since I have been working less, I have tasted a lifestyle that I now realise I want more of.
The joy of walking back from my session on the running track in the morning, past all the poor sods scuttling down into the underground on their way to work, is a gift indeed. Being able to just sit and listen to a great day-time radio play (radio! love it), or go to a lunchtime concert or a lecture on something I know nothing about, is freeing. This is a lifestyle that calls to me more and more.
And yet, for now, a significant part of my head still remains devoted to Work. That will always have to be so, however short I make my working week, for as long as I put off stopping work altogether. It’s just not possible to be entirely free while I still have any form of working commitment – simple as that.
So I realise that there has to be an end date to this, and I’ve been thinking about that a good bit lately. There’s a lot in your post that chimes for me. I reckon the time has come for me to finally decide when I will pull the plug.
I suspect that the journey transforms you; perhaps three years ago part-time was right and you have outgrown it, and as you deepen or grow this comes to the fore?
being changed by the journey of Life is good, of course, but it’s not always comfortable!
Ermine, probably one of the best things I’ve ever read – a true keeper. And right now for me, with 30 days to go until I finish labour (I’m 52) absolutely perfect timing.
Also an introvert, (I did that Myers-Briggs thing as part of a training course I did once) I had to learn to behave AS IF I was an extrovert as a teenager when I entered military service.
I was also very lucky to have had a father who always counseled me of the dangers of identifying what you did to make a living with who you actually are. Always one who enjoys deep reflection and pondering for it’s own sake, the only time I ever seem to get bored is when I’m at work, so for me finishing up with this stage of life will mean the end of boredom.
Years ago I was a great fan of Joseph Campbell and read his Hero With a Thousand Faces, and my copy is heavily anotated with notes and references. The emphasis of the story is often on the “going out” phase, but there’s also the phase of “coming back” with your fortune/wisdom/all the vital things you had to get and to teach. Might be time to brush up on what he said about that stage.
An excellent read, thanks really enjoyed it.